Please do not exclude PIDs except when knowing exactly what the problem is. The forum is full of make / model / year specific issues and work arounds and you can just copy them. I assume the Toyota does not have a CAN bus, so the rate will never be very high. The error message however means, there is some communication issue. You may follow the FAQ on "Debugging OBD connections".
Harry wrote:Please do not exclude PIDs except when knowing exactly what the problem is. The forum is full of make / model / year specific issues and work arounds and you can just copy them. I assume the Toyota does not have a CAN bus, so the rate will never be very high. The error message however means, there is some communication issue. You may follow the FAQ on "Debugging OBD connections".
- Harry
I followed the instructions and send you the logs.
The logs show you have 2 ECUs answering most request. Reply are slow, but in the expected range. The replies delivered are often inconsistent, so you will probably see artifacts in data. LapTimer has no filtering capabilities for certain ECUs currently, this would allow removing one of them and both speed up communication and get better data. Maybe in v21...
You may try switching Settings ‣ Expert Settings ‣ OBD Tweaks / Adaptive Timing from Optimized to Enabled - maybe you get better results here.
Harry wrote:The logs show you have 2 ECUs answering most request. Reply are slow, but in the expected range. The replies delivered are often inconsistent, so you will probably see artifacts in data. LapTimer has no filtering capabilities for certain ECUs currency, this would allow removing one of them and both speed up communication and get better data. Maybe in v21...
You may try switching Settings ‣ Expert Settings ‣ OBD Tweaks / Adaptive Timing from Optimized to Enabled - maybe you get better results here.
- Harry
My MR2 has the SMT transmission which has it's own computer that must be the second ECU that is being picked up.
How likely are you to make a fix for this in V21 and how soon would that be?
Next time I go out I will try the adaptive timing setting and let you know how it worked out.
I have changed plans for development in the sensors area in general. I plan to provide a scriptable interface for sensors later this year. Instead of building features into LapTimer addressing very special requirements, this will allow users to change integration and data handling on their own. Not committed yet, but excited to work on it!
Harry wrote:I have changed plans for development in the sensors area in general. I plan to provide a scriptable interface for sensors later this year. Instead of building features into LapTimer addressing very special requirements, this will allow users to change integration and data handling on their own. Not committed yet, but excited to work on it!